Craton v. Sinclair
Craton v. Sinclair
11 So. 2d 475; 152 Fla. 292; 1943 Fla. LEXIS 893
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Stack v. State ex rel. LaFratta (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
- Petersen v. Mayo (Fla. 1953)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal brings for review judgment of remand in habeas corpus proceedings instituted after trial and conviction.
All matters complained of should have been presented by motion to quash when amendments could have been legally made to meet objections. The information is not void.
We find no reversible error disclosed by the record and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.