Conran v. State
Conran v. State
17 So. 2d 82; 154 Fla. 227; 1944 Fla. LEXIS 667
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Conran v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of perjury and on appeal here he questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. .We have considered the evidence and are of the opinion that it is insufficient to sustain the verdict, hence the judgment is therefore reversed.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.