Kichinko v. Scarborough

Supreme Court of Florida
Kichinko v. Scarborough, 20 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1944)
155 Fla. 358; 1944 Fla. LEXIS 545
Buford, Terrell, Brown, Chapman, Thomas, Adams, Sebring

Kichinko v. Scarborough

Opinion of the Court

*359 PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this cause have been.examined and the peremptory writ of mandamus is awarded on authority of Singer, et al., v. Scarborough, decided this date, a like question being involved in both cases.

■It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Paul Kichinko v. E. W. Scarborough, as Director of the State Beverage Department.
Status
Published