Boggs v. State
Boggs v. State
17 So. 2d 394; 154 Fla. 180; 1944 Fla. LEXIS 649
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Boggs v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially:
My first impression was that evidence was insufficient to support conviction but careful perusal of evidence shows that accused was apprehended while exercising possession of stolen property and he gave no reasonable explanation for the possession of the stolen property and, therefore, the presumption of guilty knowledge applies and this presumption is not overcome by evidence sufficient to warrant reversal. Therefore, judgment should be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.