Levine v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Florida
Levine v. Robinson, 36 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1948)
160 Fla. 822; 1948 Fla. LEXIS 933
Terrell, Chapman, Adams, Barns, Hobson, Thomas, Sebring

Levine v. Robinson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN, ADAMS, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur. *823 THOMAS, C. J., and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

SEBRING, J.,

dissenting:

Although' I agree that the equities of the cause are with the plaintiff below, it is my view that the Chancellor should have ordered a conveyance of the property involved to the plaintiff instead of requiring the purchase price of the property to be repaid by the appellants and decreeing that it should constitute a lien against the property. Therefore, I dissent from the judgment of affirmance entered by this court.

Reference

Full Case Name
ROSE LeVINE and DORIS LeVINE, v. JOHN I. ROBINSON, as Executor of the Estate of David Nissenbaum, Deceased
Status
Published