National Surety Corp. v. Grahn

Supreme Court of Florida
National Surety Corp. v. Grahn, 62 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1952)
1952 Fla. LEXIS 1877
Drew, Mathews, Roberts, Terrell

National Surety Corp. v. Grahn

Concurring Opinion

DREW, Justice

(concurring specially).

I concur in the judgment of affirmance in this case because of my view that the appellant here (plaintiff below) failed to show good cause for reinstating the case. Having reached this conclusion it becomes unnecessary tp pass upon the question of whether Section 45.19, F.S.A., is self-operating or whether there must be an order of dismissal entered before affirmative action is taken by one of the parties.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and MATHEWS and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. DREW, J.,.concurs .specially.

Reference

Full Case Name
NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, etc. v. R. GRAHN, also known as Reinhold Grahn
Status
Published