Moorman v. Harnick

Supreme Court of Florida
Moorman v. Harnick, 73 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1954)
1954 Fla. LEXIS 1558
Drew, Hobson, Mathews, Roberts, Sebring, Terrell, Thomas

Moorman v. Harnick

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The conflict in the evidence and the inferences deducible therefrom in this case were such as to require that the question of liability be submitted to a jury, and it was therefore error to direct a verdict in plaintiff’s favor.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

It is so ordered.

*677ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, and DREW, JJ., concur. SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., dissent

Reference

Full Case Name
H. L. MOORMAN v. A. Edward HARNICK, doing business as Edward's Art Galleries
Status
Published