Makos v. Michael

Supreme Court of Florida
Makos v. Michael, 75 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 1954)
1954 Fla. LEXIS 1778
Mathews, Roberts, Sebring, Terrell

Makos v. Michael

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have the view that the final decree appealed from was entered in accordance with the principles set forth in Makos v. Prince, Fla., 64 So.2d 670, and should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J.., and TERRELL' and SEBRING, JJ., concur. *191MATHEWS, J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

MATHEWS, Justice.

I concur in the above opinion because I am bound by the majority opinion in the case of Makos v. Prince, Fla., 64 So.2d 670. However, my views with reference to this matter are set forth in the minority opinion in that case, Makos v. Prince, supra.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mrs. George MAKOS, W. M. Johnson, Ben C. Rogers and W. D. Glennon v. Roy A. MICHAEL, Jr., Kenneth Foster, Lake Lytal, Ben F. Sundy and Paul Rardin, Members of the County Commission of Palm Beach County, Florida, and John F. Kirk, Sheriff of Palm Beach County, Francis Cross, Constable of Seventh Justice of Peace District, and Buford Prescott, Constable of Eighth Justice of Peace District
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published