Ervin v. Miami Retreat Foundation

Supreme Court of Florida
Ervin v. Miami Retreat Foundation, 77 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 1955)
Drew, Hobson, Mathews, Thomas

Ervin v. Miami Retreat Foundation

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The questions attempted to be raised by appellant were foreclosed in the prior appearance of this cause, Miami Retreat Foundation v. Ervin, Fla., 66 So.2d 667. An examination of the original file in the reported case demonstrates that in the opinion filed, the word “appellees” was corrected to the singular by the striking out of the terminal “s”. By reason of a typographical error, however, the plural was perpetuated in the copy of the opinion which was released.

It follows that the order appealed from must be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

MATHEWS, C. J., and HOBSON, THOMAS and DREW, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard W. ERVIN, as Attorney General of the State of Florida, for and on behalf of the State of Florida v. MIAMI RETREAT FOUNDATION, a Florida corporation Miami Retreat, Inc., a Florida corporation Charles A. Reed Ruth Reed and Alfred O'Neill, individually and as Directors and Trustees of Miami Retreat Foundation
Status
Published