Maloy v. City of Mulberry

Supreme Court of Florida May 25, 1955

Maloy v. City of Mulberry, 80 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1955)

1955 Fla. LEXIS 3531

Bring, Drew, Hobson, Roberts, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal

Dissenting Opinion

THOMAS, Justice

(dissenting).

I think the appeal should be dismissed for lack of a final judgment.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of City of Miami v. Bethel, Fla., 1953, 65 So.2d 34; Britt v. City of Ocala, Fla., 1953, 65 So.2d 753; Williams v. City of Green Cove Springs, Fla., 1953, 65 So.2d 56; and Wilford v. City of Jacksonville Beach, Fla., 79 So.2d 516.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur. ' THOMAS and HOBSON, Jj., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

HOBSON, Justice

(dissenting).

See my special concurring opinion in City of Miami v. Bethel, Fla., 1953, 65 So.2d 34. See also my dissenting opinion in Williams v. City of Green Cove Springs, Fla., 1953, 65 So.2d 56.

Reference

Full Case Name: Joel A. MALOY v. CITY OF MULBERRY, a municipal corporation
Status: Published