Collier v. City of Homestead
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Edwards (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
- Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident (11th Cir. 2001)
- Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident (11th Cir. 2001)
- Audrey Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation (11th Cir. 2001)
- Danluck v. Lotspeich Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
- Keay v. City of Coral Gables (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bell (Fla. 1959)
- Perez v. State (Fla. 1955)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The sole question presented by the peti-‘ tion for certiorari in this case is whether the lower court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for. a summary final decree. ' To have granted the motion for summary final decree would have resulted in a judicial' determination that the zoning ordinances of the City of Homestead were invalid and unenforceable.
The burden of making error clearly appear is upon the petitioners. They have failed to carry this burden by virtue of which the petition for certiorari is denied.
This denial of the petition for cer-tiorari shall not be construed as passing'upon any of the issues in the litigation and decides only that no error has been made to appear on the basis of which the order sought to be reviewed could be disturbed. Compare State Road Department v. Lewis, Fla., 79 So.2d 699, text 700.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.