Marks v. Marks

Supreme Court of Florida October 21, 1955

Marks v. Marks, 82 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 1955)

Drew, Hobson, Roberts, Terrell, Thoma, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. TERRELL, J., dissents.

Concurring in Part

THOMA,S, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I think the decree so far as it deals with divorce should be affirmed, but that the decree so far as it allots alimony in á lump sum should be revised to provide that the total amount should be paid regardless of appellee’s death or remarriage.

Reference

Full Case Name: Sam R. MARKS v. Nadine M. MARKS
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published