Marks v. Marks
Marks v. Marks
82 So. 2d 876
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Eisenschenk v. Fowler (Fla. 1955)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I think the decree so far as it deals with divorce should be affirmed, but that the decree so far as it allots alimony in á lump sum should be revised to provide that the total amount should be paid regardless of appellee’s death or remarriage.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.