Pruitt v. McKeighan
Supreme Court of Florida
Pruitt v. McKeighan, 83 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1955)
Connell, Drew, Hob, Son, Terrell
Pruitt v. McKeighan
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judg
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William PRUITT v. William McKEIGHAN
- Status
- Published