Mercantile Insurance Co. of America v. Andrews

Supreme Court of Florida
Mercantile Insurance Co. of America v. Andrews, 86 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1956)
Drew, Hobson, Terrell, Thornal

Mercantile Insurance Co. of America v. Andrews

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm the judgments appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Coxirt, and it appearing to the court from an ’ examination of the consolidated record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeals are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judg-*432merits appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgments are

‘Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and' TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
MERCANTILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation v. Tom W. ANDREWS, Appellee CENTRAL SURETY AND INSURANCE CORPORATION, a corporation v. Tom W. ANDREWS, Appellee NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation v. Tom W. ANDREWS, Appellee OLD COLONY INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation v. Tom W. ANDREWS
Status
Published