Supreme Court of Florida, 1956

American Continental Investment, Inc. v. Borofsky

American Continental Investment, Inc. v. Borofsky
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 9, 1956 · Drew, Hob, Son, Terrell, Thornal
87 So. 2d 419; 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3721 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

American Continental Investment, Inc. v. Borofsky

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.