Meeks v. State Beverage Department

Supreme Court of Florida
Meeks v. State Beverage Department, 89 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1956)
Drew, Hob, Son, Terrell, Thornal

Meeks v. State Beverage Department

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This .cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm- the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is *494appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the decree appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
H. L. MEEKS, d/b/a The Dutch Mill Club v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT of Florida
Status
Published