Supreme Court of Florida, 1956

Meeks v. State Beverage Department

Meeks v. State Beverage Department
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided September 12, 1956 · Drew, Hob, Son, Terrell, Thornal
89 So. 2d 493 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Meeks v. State Beverage Department

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This .cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm- the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is *494appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the decree appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.