Dade County v. Houk

Supreme Court of Florida
Dade County v. Houk, 89 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 1956)
1956 Fla. LEXIS 4133
Connell, Drew, Hobson, Roberts, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal

Dade County v. Houk

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant tó 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

On Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

On rehearing granted and after oral argu-. ment before the Court en banc, it is Ordered that the per curiam opinion and judgment of this Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County appealed, from, be and the same is hereby adhered to on the authority of Dade County v. Brigham, Fla., 47 So.2d 602, 18 A.L.R.2d 1221, which case is hereby, in all respects approved and confirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida v. Mae Frances HOUK
Cited By
7 cases
Status
Published