Klose v. Sheaf
Supreme Court of Florida
Klose v. Sheaf, 90 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1956)
1956 Fla. LEXIS 3504
Connell, Drew, Roberts, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal
Klose v. Sheaf
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
070rehearing
On Rehearing Granted
We adhere to our former judgment of affirmance.
It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Florence F. KLOSE v. Ralph M. SHEAF and Emery J. Newell
- Status
- Published