City of Fort Lauderdale v. State ex rel. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida
City of Fort Lauderdale v. State ex rel. Smith, 91 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 1956)
Drew, Hobson, Terrell, Thornal

City of Fort Lauderdale v. State ex rel. Smith

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said' motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a Municipal Corporation of Florida, and Porter Reynolds, as Mayor, and H. Y. Lockhart, Robert A. Childers, John V. Russell and George C. Petersen, as and constituting the City Commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale, and General M. Wall as City Treasurer and Tax Collector of the City of Fort Lauderdale v. The STATE of Florida, upon the relation of Kenneth SMITH, d/b/a Southside Liquors/Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published