Pilafian v. Lobeck
Pilafian v. Lobeck
96 So. 2d 780; 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3584
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pilafian v. Lobeck
Opinion of the Court
The decree is affirmed. Under the rule followed in Thomas v. Thompson, 114 Fla. 833, 155 So. 321, the proof sufficiently meets the requirements of our decision in J. C. Vereen & Sons v. Houser, 123 Fla. 641, 167 So. 45.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.