Josephson v. Autry
Supreme Court of Florida
Josephson v. Autry, 99 So. 2d 230 (Fla. 1957)
Connell, Hob, Son, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal
Josephson v. Autry
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of attorneys for appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from by interlocutory appeal pursuant to the rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on interlocutory appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the inter
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Norton JOSEPHSON v. Henry AUTRY, Anthony J. Grezik, J. Kermit Coble, Hayward B. Brown and E. W. Korb, as and constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida Carl Wetherell, as the duly qualified Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida The City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida and Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham, his wife
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published