Supreme Court of Florida, 1960

Boyd v. Cochran

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided March 9, 1960 · Connell, Drew, Terrell, Thomas, Thornal

118 So. 2d 627; 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2567 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Matera v. Buchanan (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
State ex rel. Risatti v. Eaton (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
State ex rel. Singleton v. Walters (Fla. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the petition of Lewis Clyde C. Boyd, this Court issued its writ of habeas corpus directed to respondent H. G. Cochran, Jr., Director, Division of Corrections. To this writ respondent has now filed a return alleging matters which, if true, show cause why petitioner is legally detained and imprisoned by him.

While the return to the writ is not conclusive of the facts stated therein, § 79.06(1), F.S.A., its allegations are taken as true until impeached, and evidence is not needed to support an uncontroverted return. Sullivan v. State ex rel. McCrory, Fla.1951, 49 So.2d 794; Cooper v. Sinclair, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 702; Moat v. Mayo, Fla. 1955, 82 So.2d 591.

*628Petitioner, by his traverse to respondent’s. return, alleges facts in contradiction thereto. However, the facts controverted involve the very issues which were essential to his conviction in the trial court. The writ of habeas corpus will not issue where there was a remedy by appeal. Sullivan v. State ex rel. Cootner, Fla.1950, 44 So.2d 96.

In view of the above, it must be held that the writ heretofore issued should be and hereby is quashed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, TT., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.