Thomas v. Cromer

Supreme Court of Florida
Thomas v. Cromer, 135 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1961)
Connell, Drew, Hobson, Roberts, Thornal

Thomas v. Cromer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument, and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the petition is *421without merit. Therefore the writ must be and is hereby discharged, Fla.App., 124 So.2d 36.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joe M. THOMAS, d/b/a Joe M. Thomas Crane Service and Joe M. Thomas Transfer v. Freddie CROMER
Status
Published