Sadowsky v. Levine

Supreme Court of Florida February 13, 1963

Sadowsky v. Levine, 151 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1963)

Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Hobson, Ret, Smith, Terrell, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I would grant certiorari and quash the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge PEARSON, TILLMAN.

O’CONNELL, J., concurs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Lillian SADOWSKY and Sidney Sadowsky v. Benjamin LEVINE and Anna Levine
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published