. Jette v. Harbison, 158 Fla. 418, 28 So. 24 858 (1947); Springfield Co. v. Ely, 44 Fla. 319, 32 So. 892 (1902); Chisholm v. Coconut Grove Exchange Bank, 144 Fla. 770, 198 So. 703 (1940).

. Springfield Co. v. Ely, 44 Fla. 319, 32 So. 892 (1902).

. Chisholm v. Coconut Grove Exchange Bank, 144 Fla. 770, 198 So. 703 (1940).

. 158 Fla. 418, 28 So.2d 858 (1047).

. 44 Fla. 319, 327, 32 So. 892, 894-895 (1902).

“This section does not in terms require the instrument in writing to be a deed or mortgage, nor does it require the husband to join in its execution, or give his consent to its execution by the wife, nor does it in terms require the instrument to be sealed, witnessed, or acknowledged. It simply requires the wife’s consent to be given by some instrument in writing executed according to the law respecting conveyances by married women. At the time of the adoption of the constitution married women could convey their separate statutory real property by deed under seal attested and acknowledged as required by the statute, provided the husband joined in such conveyance. * * * The section of the constitution under consideration is framed with reference to the laws respecting conveyances by marrid women of personal as well as real property, for both classes of property are expressly mentioned. The word ‘conveyance’ is used in a broad sense, including conveyances of both real and personal property. The convention in adopting and the people in ratifying that instrument, it must be assumed, had in mind the fact that certain formalities were required for the conveyance of married women’s real property that were not required for the conveyance of their personal property, and that the legislature possessed the power to change or alter the forms of and requisites for the conveyance of either or both at pleasure. The section under consideration, though dealing with both classes of property, and with the liability of both classes of property for the husband’s debts, simply requires the consent of the wife to be given by some instrument in writing; the instrument to be executed according to the law respecting conveyances by married women, whatever that law should be at the time the consent is given.”

.144 Fla. 770, 772, 198 So. 703, 704 (1940):

“When K. W. Ohisholm endorsed the note he became liable to the bank for the payment of it and he also thereby in writing ratified and approved the pledge of securities as collateral for the payment of the note and when Mrs. Chisholm endorsed the note she thereby, in writing, ratified the pledge of securities for payment of the note. The result was that she thereby ratified and endorsed the pledging of securities which constituted her separate property for the debt and obligation which her husband assumed by endorsing the note. * * *

“Under this state of facts, the wife’s separate property so pledged became liable for the debt of her husband under the provisions of Section 1, Article XI of the Constitution.”