Kaufman v. Sweet
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Frazier v. Seaboard System RR, Inc. (Fla. 1987)
- Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. Pearson (Fla. 1970)
- Landry v. Sterling Apartments, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)
- Aucompaugh v. City of Punta Gorda (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On the petition of Kaufman and the cross netition of Sweet, we granted certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, because of an apparent conflict with prior decisions of this Court. After oral argument on jurisdiction and merits, and upon further consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that the writ was improvidently issued for the reason that a jurisdictional conflict of decisions is not present.
The writ of certiorari heretofore issued is hereby discharged. See Nielsen v. City of Sarasota, Fla.App., 117 So.2d 731, discussion under headnote 6, Page 734.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.