Schmidt v. Tracey

Supreme Court of Florida
Schmidt v. Tracey, 159 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1964)
Per Curiam

Schmidt v. Tracey

Opinion

159 So.2d 645 (1964)

Gertrude S. SCHMIDT, Petitioner,
v.
Raymond R. TRACEY, Respondent.

No. 32714.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 8, 1964.

Farish & Farish and J.D. Farish, Jr., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Earnest, Pruitt & Schulle and Wallis E. Schulle, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is here on Petition for Writ of Certiorari alleging conflict with Puleo v. Shaw.[1] Although conflict exists we find that inasmuch as the Puleo decision, supra, is reversed by the decision of this Court,[2] the petition herein is denied.

DREW, C.J., and TERRELL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and SEBRING (Retired), JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] 149 So.2d 880 (Fla.App.1st 1963).

[2] Shaw v. Puleo, Fla., 159 So.2d 641.

Reference

Status
Published