Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida May 13, 1964

Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp., 162 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1964)

1964 Fla. LEXIS 2981

Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 29, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*518pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jose A. FEBLES v. TALISMAN SUGAR CORPORATION, Standard Accident Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published