Super-Test Service Stations, Inc. v. Conner
Super-Test Service Stations, Inc. v. Conner
162 So. 2d 897; 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2917
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Super-Test Service Stations, Inc. v. Conner
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially) :
I concur because the question of jurisdiction is disposed of by Snedeker, et al. v. Vernmar, Ltd., et al., Fla., 151 So.2d 438. I dissented in Snedeker on the jurisdictional determination there. However, since the problem has now been authoritatively resolved by the Court it would seem that further insistence on my position would be of no avail. Hence my concurrence here.
O CONNELL, J., concurs.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting) :
I dissent because of my conviction that the issue is one which the District Court of Appeal is empowered to determine.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed under the authority of Mayo v. Texas Company, 1939, 137 Fla. 218, 188 So. 206.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.