Supreme Court of Florida, 1964

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided April 15, 1964 · Caldwell, Con, Drew, Ervin, Nell, Thornal
162 So. 2d 899; 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2922 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In*900dustrial Commission bearing date November 27, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.