Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant
Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant
162 So. 2d 899; 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2922
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.