Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Supreme Court of Florida
Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant, 162 So. 2d 899 (Fla. 1964)
1964 Fla. LEXIS 2922
Caldwell, Con, Drew, Ervin, Nell, Thornal

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In*900dustrial Commission bearing date November 27, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Angeline WASHICK v. MAISEL'S ARTHUR RESTAURANT and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published