F. A. Chastain Construction Co. v. Gaines

Supreme Court of Florida June 17, 1964

F. A. Chastain Construction Co. v. Gaines, 165 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 1964)

1964 Fla. LEXIS 2730

Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*169pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: F. A. CHASTAIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Russell GAINES and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published