Supreme Court of Florida, 1964

Gladfelter v. Loiselle

Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 1, 1964 · Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

165 So. 2d 767; 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2821 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Curbelo v. Ullman (Fla. 1990)
Hall v. Morozewych (Alaska 1984)
Jayre Inc. v. WACHOVIA BANK & TR. CO. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Ansel v. Kizer (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Schuppener v. Stein (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Eastern Koex Co. Ltd., Inc. v. Bonanza Import, Etc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Bader Bros. Van Lines, Inc. v. Jay (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On petitioner’s request, writ of certiorari was granted and oral argument authorized pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. because of a certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that their decision in Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 “passes upon a question of great public interest.” After further consideration we hold that the opinion of the District Court, supra, properly disposes of the questions of law presented and is approved by this court.

Accordingly the writ of certiorari heretofore entered is discharged.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.