Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pedrick

Supreme Court of Florida July 10, 1964

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pedrick, 166 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 1964)

1964 Fla. LEXIS 2547

Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 30, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A. .

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *142there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, as Carrier, and Koppers Company, Inc., as Employer v. Charles Quinton PEDRICK and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published