Supreme Court of Florida, 1964

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pedrick

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pedrick
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided July 10, 1964 · Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas
166 So. 2d 141; 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2547 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pedrick

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 30, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A. .

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that *142there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.