Prince v. Sweedler

Supreme Court of Florida
Prince v. Sweedler, 166 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1964)
1964 Fla. LEXIS 2575
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Thomas

Prince v. Sweedler

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 7, 1963.

*438We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Nathan PRINCE v. Kenny SWEEDLER, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published