Dunn v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Florida
Dunn v. Holmes, 166 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1964)
1964 Fla. LEXIS 2577
Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Dunn v. Holmes

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 13, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert H. DUNN and the Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Willie B. HOLMES and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published