By petition for a writ of certiorari we lhave for review an order of the Florida ilndustrial Commission bearing date April -28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve -no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate -Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the ; record and briefs leads us to conclude that -there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is ■ therefore denied.

(dissenting):

I must dissent. The deputy was correct •■in finding the claimant to be a part time employee.