Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Co.

Supreme Court of Florida September 9, 1964

Stratton v. Tidewater Auchter Co., 167 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 1964)

Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Ervin, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. '

Reference

Full Case Name: Shellie T. STRATTON v. TIDEWATER AUCHTER COMPANY, George D. Auchter Company, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published