Shakespeare v. Burdick Construction

Supreme Court of Florida October 23, 1964

Shakespeare v. Burdick Construction, 168 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 1964)

Connell, Drew, Ervin, Nal, Roberts, Thor

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1964.

f We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the ¡record and brief of the petitioner leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied:

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: James SHAKESPEARE v. BURDICK CONSTRUCTION, Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency
Status: Published