Ford v. Acme Roof Decks, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida
Ford v. Acme Roof Decks, Inc., 168 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 1964)
Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Tpiornal

Ford v. Acme Roof Decks, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we-have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 24, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, TPIORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Leila FORD v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published