McDonald v. Ralston Purina Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
McDonald v. Ralston Purina Co., 169 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1964)
Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thorn

McDonald v. Ralston Purina Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 9, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORN AL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
James A. McDONALD v. RALSTON PURINA COMPANY, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission
Status
Published