Prince v. Miami Provision Co.
Prince v. Miami Provision Co.
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date October 29, 1963, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I believe the commission erred in reversing the order of the deputy in this proceeding upon authority of decisions condemning modification upon mere cumulative evidence.
I would accordingly reverse with directions for reinstatement of the deputy’s award.
. Sheets v. City of Miami, Fla.App.1959, 111 So.2d 690; Sonny Boy’s Fruit Co. v. Compton, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 17; Hall v. Seaboard Maritime Corp., Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 384, and McDonough v. Versailles Hotel, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 16.
070rehearing
ON REHEARING
A rehearing having been granted in this cause and the case having been further considered upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; it is thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that the original decision heretofore filed in the above styled cause be and it is hereby reaffirmed and adhered to on rehearing.
DREW, C. J., adheres to view expressed in dissent to original opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Elder PRINCE v. MIAMI PROVISION COMPANY
- Status
- Published