Worthington v. Simplex Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Florida January 8, 1965

Worthington v. Simplex Sales Co., 170 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1965)

Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 'July 9,. 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*445pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ-, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Henry M. WORTHINGTON v. SIMPLEX SALES COMPANY, Inc., Kniffin Transfer Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Maryland Casualty Company and Florida Industrial Commission
Status: Published