Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal
Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal
172 So. 2d 450; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3251
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal
Opinion of the Court
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 8, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.