Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal

Supreme Court of Florida
Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal, 172 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1965)
1965 Fla. LEXIS 3251
Caldwell, Connell, Drew, Nal, Roberts, Thor

Dade Neon Sign & Service v. Vidal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 8, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
DADE NEON SIGN & SERVICE and Highway Insurance Company v. Roberto VIDAL and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company
Status
Published