Grall v. Risden

Supreme Court of Florida
Grall v. Risden, 174 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1965)
1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147
Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Grall v. Risden

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—

The petition for certiorari is denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Chief Justice

(dissenting):

I think we clearly have jurisdiction. It is my view that the trial court should have submitted the issues to a jury for determination. I would quash the decision of the District Court.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bernard F. GRALL v. Joseph RISDEN, Jr., d/b/a Risden's Restaurant
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published