Grall v. Risden
Grall v. Risden
174 So. 2d 736; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Grall v. Risden
Opinion of the Court
After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—
The petition for certiorari is denied.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting):
I think we clearly have jurisdiction. It is my view that the trial court should have submitted the issues to a jury for determination. I would quash the decision of the District Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.