Supreme Court of Florida, 1965

Grall v. Risden

Grall v. Risden
Supreme Court of Florida · Decided May 5, 1965 · Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
174 So. 2d 736; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3147 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Grall v. Risden

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After careful re-examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court so—

The petition for certiorari is denied.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. DREW, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Chief Justice

(dissenting):

I think we clearly have jurisdiction. It is my view that the trial court should have submitted the issues to a jury for determination. I would quash the decision of the District Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.