Holland Paving Co. v. Dann
Holland Paving Co. v. Dann
175 So. 2d 780; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3170
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Holland Paving Co. v. Dann
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.
Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on' both jurisdiction and merits.
After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.