Holland Paving Co. v. Dann

Supreme Court of Florida May 19, 1965

Holland Paving Co. v. Dann, 175 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1965)

1965 Fla. LEXIS 3170

Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Roberts, Willis

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on' both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: HOLLAND PAVING CO., Inc., a Florida corporation v. James A. DANN, Individually, and James A. Dann as the Administrator of the Estate of James Arthur Dann, Jr.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published