Byrd v. Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Co.

Supreme Court of Florida June 9, 1965

Byrd v. Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Co., 176 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 1965)

1965 Fla. LEXIS 3183

Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we-have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 31, 1964,

We find that oral argument would serve-no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that. *87there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., •concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: Bernice BYRD v. HAV-A-TAMPA CIGAR CO.
Status: Published