Sullivan v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Florida
Sullivan v. Robertson, 177 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1965)
1965 Fla. LEXIS 3019
Caldwell, Connell, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal

Sullivan v. Robertson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March' 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY v. Charles B. ROBERTSON
Status
Published