Chinarama, Inc. v. Rodriguez
Chinarama, Inc. v. Rodriguez
177 So. 2d 471; 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3020
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Chinarama, Inc. v. Rodriguez
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The attorneys for respondent Rodriguez are awarded a fee in the amount of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) for services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.